Students enrol in a public speaking course with an existing set of skills and knowledge. Most know that volume, expression and eye contact are important; some know that stance and gesture are important; a few understand that that content and practise are vitally important, and can make the difference between success and failure. Regardless of what they know about public speaking when they start a course, very few really understand why these skills are important. The beginning of each course is never a level playing field….and it never ends up a level playing field. The progress made by the individual students is just that – individual progress. At the beginning of each course I always make a point of hammering home the “progress versus comparison” issue; the measure of success is against an individual’s performance from one week to the next, never against another student in the course.
Public speaking is one of those areas where the progress made by students is noticeable from the first session. The progress that many students make in terms of delivery is nothing short of amazing – they seem to grow in skill and confidence from session to session, so rapidly at times that it is easy to forget the point at which they started. You can see it in the way they stand, the way they use their palm cards; the way they look at the audience, and the way they use gesture. You can hear it in the volume of their voice, the pace at which they speak, the way they use expression, and the clarity of their pronunciation. Progress can also be measured by the knowledge they have gained. Although harder to “see and hear”, the value of knowledge should never be dismissed or overlooked in favour of the more obvious signposts of progress.
With one of my courses nearing completion, I decided to see how far the students have progressed in terms of the knowledge they’ve gained from the course, by having them critique a video of a student speaking in an interstate speaking competition. Regular video recording of speeches and analysis is an important part of the program; observing and critiquing another speaker (and themselves), enables the students consolidate their knowledge of important speaking skills, as well as lead to an understanding of why these skills are important. I was excited and impressed with the outcome.Not only did I notice an improved maturity in their critiquing skills, they were able to identify the key qualities the speaker utilised and explain the significance of each quality in isolation, and in the context of speech as a whole.
They were able to pick up how the tone and volume of the speaker’s voice reflected the tone of the speech’s content, as well as the speaker’s emotion and passion for the topic. They identified how the words the speaker chose delivered information, and also helped the audience to visualise what she was speaking about. They were quick to point out the speaker’s confidence, attributing it to their passion for the topic, knowledge of the topic, and the fact that they had practised their speech. They made note of eye contact (and the fact that the speaker rarely used palm cards), their ability to scan the audience and maintain that important connection at all times. When I asked them why the speaker had even bothered to use palm cards when they had obviously memorised their speech, they looked at me in shock. “Dayle!” they exclaimed in almost perfect synchronicity, “Nerves can make your stomach churn and your mind stop working. If she didn’t have her palm cards and nerves caused her to forget something, what would she do then?” Nothing like the teacher being put in their place by the students!
To hear the group speak of passion and topic knowledge, the importance of practise and preparation, and how voice, eye contact and gesture can be used to appeal to the audience, makes me proud. I wonder if they can see their progress for themselves, or if they’ve forgotten where they started from on that nerve-wracking first day? I can see their growth and progress – in the way they stand and the set of their shoulders; the way they deliver a presentation; the way they analyse their own speaking and the presentations of others’; in the commitment they show to preparing and practising; and in the way they smile when it’s their turn to speak. They have come so far in such a short time, as a collective group, but more importantly, as individuals.